IstoÉ
A
26/30
Excellent

Nota maior que 96% dos artigos

Mega-Sena, 2995: prêmio acumula e sobe para R$ 45 milhões

istoedinheiro.com.br · Da IstoÉ Dinheiro · 2026-04-11 · 185 words
WhatsApp
Source Quality 4
Perspective Balance 5
Contextual Depth 3
Language Neutrality 5
Transparency 4
Logical Coherence 5
▸ Article
11/04/2026 - 21:02

Ninguém acertou as seis dezenas do sorteio 2995 da Mega-Sena. Os números sorteados neste sábado, 11, foram: 08– 29 – 42 – 49 – 50– 58.

Segundo a Caixa, a estimativa do prêmio principal do próximo sorteio subiu para R$ 45 milhões.

Apesar de ninguém acertar as seis dezenas, 54 apostas acertaram a quina e vão embolsar R$ 42.308,07 cada uma. Outros 2.889 apostadores acertaram quatro números e irão receber R$ 1.303,52 cada um. Veja aqui o detalhamento.

O próximo concurso da Mega-Sena será na terça-feira, 14. As apostas na Mega-Sena podem ser feitas até as 19h do dia do sorteio nas lotéricas de todo o país, no portal Loterias Caixa e no app Loterias CAIXA, além do Internet Banking Caixa para clientes do banco.

A aposta mínima da Mega-Sena custa R$ 6, e você tem direito de escolher seis dezenas de 1 a 60. Vale ressaltar que a chance de acerto para uma aposta com seis dezenas é de 50.063.860 para cada uma, segundo a Caixa.

Todos os concursos são transmitidos a partir das 21h, pelo canal da CAIXA no YouTube.

Tap highlighted text for details

Source Quality
Perspective
Context
Neutrality
Transparency
Logic
▸ Source Quality 4/5
4/5 Score

Source classification (primary/secondary/tertiary), named vs anonymous, expert credentials, variety

Summary

The article consistently cites the official lottery organization (Caixa) as its primary source for all key data and claims.

Findings 2

"Segundo a Caixa, a estimativa do prêmio principal do próximo sorteio subiu para R$ 45 milhões."

Direct attribution of prize estimate to the official source.

Primary source

"Vale ressaltar que a chance de acerto para uma aposta com seis dezenas é de 50.063.860 para cada uma, segundo a Caixa."

Direct attribution of odds data to the official source.

Primary source
▸ Perspective Balance 5/5
5/5 Score

Acknowledgment of multiple viewpoints, counterarguments, and balanced presentation

Summary

The article is purely factual, reporting lottery results and procedures without presenting any perspectives, arguments, or opinions that would require balancing.

Findings 1

"Ninguém acertou as seis dezenas do sorteio 2995 da Mega-Sena."

This is a neutral, factual statement of result; no perspective is implied.

Balance indicator
▸ Contextual Depth 3/5
3/5 Score

Background information, statistics, comprehensiveness of coverage

Summary

Provides standard operational details (draw numbers, dates, ticket prices, odds) but lacks broader historical or analytical context about the lottery.

Findings 3

"54 apostas acertaram a quina e vão embolsar R$ 42.308,07 cada uma."

Provides specific statistical data on secondary prize winners.

Statistic

"A aposta mínima da Mega-Sena custa R$ 6, e você tem direito de escolher seis dezenas de 1 a 60."

Provides basic explanatory background on how to play.

Background

"s é de 50.063.860 para cada uma, segundo a Caixa. Todos os c"

Provides key statistical context (odds).

Statistic
▸ Language Neutrality 5/5
5/5 Score

Absence of loaded, sensationalist, or politically biased language

Summary

Language is entirely factual, descriptive, and free of sensationalist, emotionally loaded, or politically biased terms.

Findings 2

"Os números sorteados neste sábado, 11, foram: 08– 29 – 42 – 49 – 50– 58."

Neutral, factual listing of numbers.

Neutral language

"O próximo concurso da Mega-Sena será na terça-feira, 14."

Neutral, factual statement of future event.

Neutral language
▸ Transparency 4/5
4/5 Score

Author attribution, dates, methodology disclosure, quote attribution

Summary

Article has clear author attribution, date/time stamp, and attributes all key claims. Lacks explicit methodology disclosure, which is less critical for this straightforward report.

Findings 1

"Segundo a Caixa,"

Clear attribution for the source of the prize estimate.

Quote attribution
▸ Logical Coherence 5/5
5/5 Score

Internal consistency of claims, absence of contradictions and unsupported causation

Summary

The article presents a logically consistent sequence of facts: draw results, prize updates, secondary winners, next draw info, and general rules. No contradictions or unsupported claims detected.

Logic Issues

Contradiction · high

Conflicting values for 'the': 2995 vs 14

"Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P4"

Contradiction · high

Conflicting values for 'the': 2995 vs 1

"Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P6"

Contradiction · high

Conflicting values for 'the': 14 vs 1

"Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P6"

Core Claims

"No one won the Mega-Sena jackpot in draw 2995."

Implied official result from Caixa (the lottery organizer), as the article reports the draw outcome authoritatively. Primary

"The estimated jackpot for the next draw is R$ 45 million."

Explicitly attributed to Caixa: 'Segundo a Caixa'. Primary

Logic Model Inspector

Inconsistencies Found

Extracted Propositions (8)

  • P1

    "The winning numbers for draw 2995 were 08, 29, 42, 49, 50, 58."

    Factual In contradiction
  • P2

    "54 bets matched five numbers (quina), winning R$ 42,308.07 each."

    Factual
  • P3

    "2,889 bets matched four numbers, winning R$ 1,303.52 each."

    Factual
  • P4

    "The next draw is on Tuesday, April 14."

    Factual In contradiction
  • P5

    "Tickets cost a minimum of R$ 6 for six numbers from 1 to 60."

    Factual
  • P6

    "The odds of winning the jackpot with a single ticket are 1 in 50,063,860."

    Factual In contradiction
  • P7

    "Draws are broadcast on the CAIXA YouTube channel from 9 PM."

    Factual
  • P8

    "Because no one won the jackpot (draw 2995), the causes prize for the next draw increased to R$ 45 million."

    Causal

Claim Relationships Graph

Contradiction
Causal
Temporal

Detected Contradictions (3)

  • 1
    Involved propositions: P1 P4

    Conflicting values for 'the': 2995 vs 14

    Show formal proof 
    Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P4
  • 2
    Involved propositions: P1 P6

    Conflicting values for 'the': 2995 vs 1

    Show formal proof 
    Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P6
  • 3
    Involved propositions: P4 P6

    Conflicting values for 'the': 14 vs 1

    Show formal proof 
    Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P6
View Formal Logic Representation 
=== Propositions ===
P1 [factual]: The winning numbers for draw 2995 were 08, 29, 42, 49, 50, 58.
P2 [factual]: 54 bets matched five numbers (quina), winning R$ 42,308.07 each.
P3 [factual]: 2,889 bets matched four numbers, winning R$ 1,303.52 each.
P4 [factual]: The next draw is on Tuesday, April 14.
P5 [factual]: Tickets cost a minimum of R$ 6 for six numbers from 1 to 60.
P6 [factual]: The odds of winning the jackpot with a single ticket are 1 in 50,063,860.
P7 [factual]: Draws are broadcast on the CAIXA YouTube channel from 9 PM.
P8 [causal]: Because no one won the jackpot (draw 2995), the causes prize for the next draw increased to R$ 45 million.

=== Constraints ===
P1 contradicts P4
  Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2995 vs 14
P1 contradicts P6
  Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2995 vs 1
P4 contradicts P6
  Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 14 vs 1

=== Causal Graph ===
because no one won the jackpot draw 2995 the -> prize for the next draw increased to r 45 million

=== Detected Contradictions ===
UNSAT: P1 AND P4
  Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P4
UNSAT: P1 AND P6
  Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P6
UNSAT: P4 AND P6
  Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P6

Quer avaliar outro artigo? Cole uma nova URL →