Trying to Block Arms to Israel, Bernie Sanders Denounces AIPAC’s Massive Election Spending
The resolutions marked the second time since November that Sanders forced a vote on arms sales. Once again, they exposed a deep divide among Democrats and blanket Republican support for Israel.
The Senate voted 15-82 on the first resolution, concerning 2,000-pound bombs, with all Republicans present voting against it, along with most Democrats. Sanders was joined by 14 Democrats.
The second resolution, focusing on other weapons, fared even worse. It was defeated 15-83.
The Trump administration officially opposed the resolutions, along with the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Sanders, in a passionate floor speech, denounced AIPAC for its massive spending on last year's elections.
"History will not forgive us for this."
"If you are a Republican, and you vote against the Trump–Musk administration in one way or the other, you've got to look over your shoulder and worry that you are going to get a call from Elon Musk, the wealthiest man in the world," Sanders said. "If you are a Democrat, you have to worry about the billionaires who fund AIPAC."
He cast his resolutions as a chance to stop exporting weapons that enable what he called "barbarism" in Gaza.
"History will not forgive us for this," Sanders said. "The time is long overdue for us to tell the Netanyahu government that we will not provide more weapons of destruction for them."
Changing Landscape
The votes came only four months after Sanders's prior, unsuccessful attempt to block arms sales to Israel, but against a vastly different geopolitical backdrop.
Since November, Israel has reached and abandoned a ceasefire with Hamas. Donald Trump has taken over the White House from Joe Biden, while touting his support for ethnically cleansing Gaza. And a Republican majority has assumed control in the Senate.
Sanders's resolutions had little chance of passing either time, but he has cast both as tests of the Senate's conscience.
One of the resolutions up for a vote Thursday would have blocked the sale of more than 35,000 2,000-pound bombs, which have been widely criticized by humanitarian groups for the indiscriminate destruction they cause in densely populated urban areas such as the Gaza Strip.
The other resolution targeted the sale of thousands of smaller-diameter — but still powerful — bombs and thousands of bomb-guidance kits and fuses.
Sanders said the situation in Gaza now is even worse than it was during the Biden administration, which humanitarian groups criticized for its half-hearted attempts to pressure Israel.
"What is happening right now is unthinkable. Today it is 31 days and counting with absolutely no humanitarian aid getting into Gaza," Sanders said. "That is a clear violation of the Geneva Convention, the Foreign Assistance Act, and basic human decency. It is a war crime. You don't starve children, and it is pushing things toward an even deeper catastrophe."
Despite Sanders's attempt to tie his resolutions to opposition to Trump, many Democrats voted against them. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., voted no, as did Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., who gave a floor speech to rally support against the resolution.
Passing the resolutions, Rosen said, would send a "message to terrorists" of "impunity."
"If we are serious about stability in the region," she said, "and the safe and secure state of Israel someday living alongside a peaceful, independent Palestinian state, I urge all my colleagues to vote no on these resolutions."
Fewer Votes
Critics of Israel's war had hoped that the earlier resolutions in November, while unlikely to succeed, might begin a longer process of building support for Palestinians in Congress. Sanders's resolutions on Thursday, however, drew four fewer votes than his best showing in November.
One notable defection was of Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., who faced a backlash from some Jewish community leaders over his support of Sanders's first set of resolutions in November.
After defending his earlier votes, Ossoff voted against blocking arms sales on Thursday. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Ossoff is considered the Democrats' most vulnerable incumbent in next year's election, and the party will also be defending three open seats that Republicans have a chance of taking, according to the Cook Political Report.
Seeming to anticipate electoral concerns from Democrats, Sanders during his speech bemoaned the role of money in politics and the influence of AIPAC, which spent on 389 congressional races last year. The pro-Israel lobby group had urged its members to oppose Sanders's "dangerous" resolutions in a message before the vote.
AIPAC hailed the vote in a press release.
"We applaud the Trump administration for approving these sales and helping ensure Israel has the resources it needs to win," the group said. "The majority of Senate Democrats and Senate Republicans reaffirmed profound American support for our ally and rejected the repeated dangerous efforts by Senator Sanders and his allies to weaken Israel and undermine the U.S.-Israel relationship."
A group that has been critical of Israel, the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project, expressed its disappointment after the vote.
"Democrats in Congress have their lowest approval rating in decades," the group's executive director Margaret DeReus, said in a statement, "and today's vote was yet another demonstration of why they have lost the trust of their own voters and the American people."
IT'S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT.
What we're seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.
This is not hyperbole.
Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation.
Yet far too many are still covering Trump's assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as "unconventional," "testing the boundaries," and "aggressively flexing power."
The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy.
We're independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
IT'S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government's full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump's project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That's where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We're independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
I'M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept's editor-in-chief. It's been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government's full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump's project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That's where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We're independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
Latest Stories
Voices
The Bloodbath at Washington Post Is All Jeff Bezos's Fault
Billionaires like Bezos and Trump have no real interest in a free press — particularly when massive profits are on the line.
Shipyard Bosses Forced to Pay Overtime to Get People to Stay for Pete Hegseth Speech
"They issued a polling sheet this morning to see who would attend and, at least from my crew, there were no takers."
Chilling Dissent
"Terrorist": How ICE Weaponized 9/11's Scarlet Letter
Spencer Ackerman on how the politics of counterterrorism led to ICE and CBP completing their transformation into a death squad — and why the agencies are unreformable.
Hover overTap highlighted text for details
Source Quality
Source classification (primary/secondary/tertiary), named vs anonymous, expert credentials, variety
Summary
Adequate named sources including Senator Sanders and Senator Rosen, but relies heavily on statements and lacks primary source diversity.
Specific Findings from the Article (4)
" Sanders, in a passionate floor speech, denounced AIPAC for its ma"
Direct attribution to Senator Bernie Sanders.
Named source" Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., voted no, as did Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., who gave a floor speech to rally s"
Named sources for opposing perspective.
Named source" according to the Cook Political Report. Seeming t"
Tertiary source citation without direct attribution.
Secondary source" the group's executive director Margaret DeReus, said in a statement, "and toda"
Named expert source from critical organization.
Named sourcePerspective Balance
Acknowledgment of multiple viewpoints, counterarguments, and balanced presentation
Summary
Clear acknowledgment of multiple perspectives including Sanders, AIPAC, opposing senators, and critical groups.
Specific Findings from the Article (4)
" Sanders was joined by 14 Democrats. The secon"
Shows support for Sanders' position.
Balance indicator" all Republicans present voting against it, along with most Democrats. Sanders wa"
Shows opposition to Sanders' position.
Balance indicator" Passing the resolutions, Rosen said, would send a "message to terrorists" of "impunity." "If we ar"
Direct quote presenting counterargument.
Balance indicator" AIPAC hailed the vote in a press release. "We appla"
Includes opposing organization's perspective.
Balance indicatorContextual Depth
Background information, statistics, comprehensiveness of coverage
Summary
Good historical context, statistical data about votes and weapons, and background on political landscape.
Specific Findings from the Article (4)
" The votes came only four months after Sanders's prior, unsuccessful attempt to block a"
Provides historical context.
Background" would have blocked the sale of more than 35,000 2,000-pound bombs, which hav"
Specific quantitative data.
Statistic" Since November, Israel has reached and abandoned a ceasefire with Hamas. Donald Tru"
Geopolitical context.
Background" which spent on 389 congressional races last year. The pro-Is"
Statistical data about AIPAC spending.
StatisticLanguage Neutrality
Absence of loaded, sensationalist, or politically biased language
Summary
Moderate loaded language including emotionally charged terms and politically loaded descriptions.
Specific Findings from the Article (2)
""barbarism" in Gaza."
Emotionally charged term from Sanders.
Sensationalist" The Senate voted 15-82 on the first resolution, concernin"
Factual, neutral reporting.
Neutral languageTransparency
Author attribution, dates, methodology disclosure, quote attribution
Summary
Good attribution with author, date, and clear quote attribution, though lacking methodology disclosure.
Logical Coherence
Internal consistency of claims, absence of contradictions and unsupported causation
Summary
No logical inconsistencies detected; claims are supported and timeline is consistent.
Core Claims & Their Sources
-
"Senate voted down Bernie Sanders' resolutions to block arms sales to Israel."
Source: Article reporting based on Senate vote results and statements Named secondary
-
"Sanders denounced AIPAC's election spending and influence."
Source: Direct quotes from Senator Bernie Sanders Named secondary
-
"The votes exposed divisions among Democrats regarding Israel policy."
Source: Analysis based on vote counts and statements from multiple senators Named secondary
Logic Model Inspector
ConsistentExtracted Propositions (7)
-
P1
"The Senate voted 15-82 on the first resolution concerning 2,000-pound bombs."
Factual -
P2
"The second resolution was defeated 15-83."
Factual -
P3
"Sanders forced similar votes in November 2024."
Factual -
P4
"AIPAC spent on 389 congressional races last year."
Factual -
P5
"AIPAC's spending influences Democratic causes politicians' votes on Israel issues."
Causal -
P6
"Electoral concerns affect senators' causes positions on Israel arms sales."
Causal -
P7
"Trump administration policies have changed the causes geopolitical backdrop for Israel arms sales."
Causal
Claim Relationships Graph
View Formal Logic Representation
=== Propositions === P1 [factual]: The Senate voted 15-82 on the first resolution concerning 2,000-pound bombs. P2 [factual]: The second resolution was defeated 15-83. P3 [factual]: Sanders forced similar votes in November 2024. P4 [factual]: AIPAC spent on 389 congressional races last year. P5 [causal]: AIPAC's spending influences Democratic causes politicians' votes on Israel issues. P6 [causal]: Electoral concerns affect senators' causes positions on Israel arms sales. P7 [causal]: Trump administration policies have changed the causes geopolitical backdrop for Israel arms sales. === Causal Graph === aipacs spending influences democratic -> politicians votes on israel issues electoral concerns affect senators -> positions on israel arms sales trump administration policies have changed the -> geopolitical backdrop for israel arms sales
All claims are logically consistent. No contradictions, temporal issues, or circular reasoning detected.