▸ Article
A curva de juros futuros brasileira recuou, nos vencimentos de curto e médio prazos, pela terceira sessão consecutiva, com o mercado dando continuidade ao processo de retirada de prêmios da curva brasileira em meio à expectativa de que EUA e Irã possam encerrar a guerra em breve.
As taxa de Depósito Interfinanceiro (DI) para janeiro de 2027, de curtíssimo prazo, fechou a 14,035% ante 14,105% do ajuste anterior.
Já a taxa de DI para janeiro de 2029, de médio prazo, terminou a sessão a 13,675% ante 13,725% do fechamento anterior.
Já DI para janeiro de 2036, de longo prazo, encerrou o dia a 13,870% ante 13,855% do fechamento de da última terça-feira (31), com avanço de 0,15 ponto percenual.
Nos Estados Unidos, os rendimentos (yields) dos títulos do Tesouro norte-americano, os Treasuries, fecharam em alta.
O yield do Treasury de dois anos – mais sensível a política monetária – fechou em queda, a 3,805% ante 3,799% do ajuste anterior. Já o retorno do título de dez anos – referência global para decisões de investimento – subiu a 4,321% ante 4,311% da última terça-feira.
Combustíveis e Selic
Os investidores continuaram a manter os efeitos da guerra sobre a inflação brasileira, em função da disparada do petróleo, no radar.
Pressionada pelo cenário internacional, a Petrobras elevou o preço médio de venda do querosene de aviação (QAV) em cerca de 55% para as distribuidoras em abril. Os ajustes do QAV ocorrem todo início de mês, conforme previsto em contratos.
Em comunicado durante a tarde, a Petrobras informou que permitirá que as distribuidoras parcelem este aumento, em uma medida que também poderá ser adotada em maio e junho, para minimizar o impacto.
A disparada recente dos preços do petróleo, com impacto sobre o custo dos combustíveis no Brasil, vinha dando força à leitura de que o Banco Central não terá espaço para acelerar o ciclo de cortes da Selic no fim de abril.
Nesta quarta-feira, no entanto, a expectativa de um acordo para o fim da guerra fez o mercado elevar um pouco as apostas de corte de 50 pontos-base na próxima decisão do Comitê de Política Monetária (Copom), em abril.
Na B3, as opções de Copom precificavam na última terça-feira (31) –– na atualização mais recente, 37,50% de chance de o Copom cortar a Selic em 25 pontos-base, para 14,50% ao ano, mantém-se majoritária, com 48% de chance. Para manutenção dos juros a 14,75% a.a., a probabilidade de 15%.
Já probabilidade de redução de 50 pontos-base, para 14,25% a.a., era de 27%. Na atualização anterior, a chance era de 23%.
Antes da guerra, os percentuais eram de 77,50% para corte de 50 pontos-base em abril, 20,04% para redução de 25 pontos-base e zero para manutenção.
Conflito no Irã
No 32º dia de conflito no Oriente Médio, o mercado operou na expectativa de um acordo de paz entre os Estados Unidos e o Irã.
Pela manhã, o presidente Trump afirmou que o Irã pediu um cessar-fogo, em uma postagem no Truth Social. Mas o porta-voz do Ministério das Relações Exteriores do Irã e a Guarda Revolucionária do país negou as declarações.
Já no final da tarde, o presidente norte-americano disse que os EUA "sairão do Irã muito rapidamente" e poderão retornar para "ataques pontuais", se necessário, em entrevista por telefone à Reuters.
Trump fará uma atualização sobre a situação no Irã em um pronunciamento hoje às 22h (horário de Brasília), segundo a Casa Branca. Segundo a Bloomberg, ele deve reiterar o cronograma de 2 a 3 semanas para que as forças norte-americanas encerrem a guerra.
*Com informações de Reuters
Hover overTap highlighted text for details
▸ Source Quality 3/5
Source classification (primary/secondary/tertiary), named vs anonymous, expert credentials, variety
Summary
The article uses a mix of tertiary sources (citing other media) and one named primary source (President Trump), but lacks direct expert commentary or multiple primary sources.
Findings 4
"*Com informações de Reuters"
The article cites Reuters as a source of information.
Tertiary source"Segundo a Bloomberg, ele deve reiterar o cronograma"
The article cites Bloomberg as a source for a claim.
Tertiary source"o presidente Trump afirmou que o Irã pediu um cessar-fogo"
The article directly quotes a statement from President Trump.
Primary source"o presidente norte-americano disse que os EUA "sairão do Irã muito rapidamente""
The article directly quotes a statement from President Trump in an interview.
Primary source▸ Perspective Balance 4/5
Acknowledgment of multiple viewpoints, counterarguments, and balanced presentation
Summary
The article acknowledges conflicting perspectives on the ceasefire claim, presenting both the U.S. statement and the Iranian denial.
Findings 1
"o presidente Trump afirmou que o Irã pediu um cessar-fogo, em uma postagem no Truth Social. Mas o porta-voz do Ministério das Relações Exteriores do Irã e a Guarda Revolucionária do país negou as d..."
The article presents the U.S. claim and the Iranian denial, showing balance.
Balance indicator▸ Contextual Depth 4/5
Background information, statistics, comprehensiveness of coverage
Summary
The article provides good contextual depth with specific financial data, historical market probabilities, and background on the conflict's timeline and impact.
Findings 4
"As taxa de Depósito Interfinanceiro (DI) para janeiro de 2027, de curtíssimo prazo, fechou a 14,035% ante 14,105%"
Provides specific financial data.
Statistic"Na B3, as opções de Copom precificavam na última terça-feira (31) –– na atualização mais recente, 37,50% de chance de o Copom cortar a Selic em 25 pontos-base"
Provides detailed market probability data.
Statistic"No 32º dia de conflito no Oriente Médio"
Provides temporal context for the conflict.
Background"Antes da guerra, os percentuais eram de 77,50% para corte de 50 pontos-base em abril"
Provides historical market context for comparison.
Background▸ Language Neutrality 5/5
Absence of loaded, sensationalist, or politically biased language
Summary
The language is consistently neutral, factual, and free from sensationalist or politically loaded terms.
Findings 2
"Juros futuros recuam pela 3ª sessão consecutiva"
Neutral, factual headline.
Neutral language"o mercado operou na expectativa de um acordo de paz"
Neutral reporting of market sentiment.
Neutral language▸ Transparency 4/5
Author attribution, dates, methodology disclosure, quote attribution
Summary
The article has clear author attribution, a date, and attributes quotes, but lacks explicit methodology disclosure.
Findings 2
"em entrevista por telefone à Reuters."
Attributes a quote to a source and the medium.
Quote attribution"segundo a Casa Branca."
Attributes information to a source.
Quote attribution▸ Logical Coherence 5/5
Internal consistency of claims, absence of contradictions and unsupported causation
Summary
No logical inconsistencies, contradictions, or unsupported causal claims were detected in the article.
Logic Issues
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2027 vs 2
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P4"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2027 vs 10
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P5"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2027 vs 32
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P8"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2029 vs 2
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P2 and P4"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2029 vs 10
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P2 and P5"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2029 vs 32
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P2 and P8"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2036 vs 2
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P3 and P4"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2036 vs 10
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P3 and P5"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2036 vs 32
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P3 and P8"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2 vs 10
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P5"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 2 vs 32
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P8"
Contradiction · high
Conflicting values for 'the': 10 vs 32
"Heuristic: Values conflict between P5 and P8"
Core Claims
"Brazilian interest rate futures fell for the third consecutive session due to market expectations of a peace agreement in the Middle East."
Market analysis/expectation presented as general fact. Unattributed
"President Trump stated that Iran requested a ceasefire, but Iranian officials denied the claim."
Direct statements from President Trump and Iranian officials as reported. Primary
Logic Model Inspector
Inconsistencies FoundExtracted Propositions (12)
-
P1
"The DI rate for Jan 2027 closed at 14.035%."
Factual In contradiction -
P2
"The DI rate for Jan 2029 closed at 13.675%."
Factual In contradiction -
P3
"The DI rate for Jan 2036 closed at 13.870%."
Factual In contradiction -
P4
"The 2-year Treasury yield closed at 3.805%."
Factual In contradiction -
P5
"The 10-year Treasury yield closed at 4.321%."
Factual In contradiction -
P6
"Petrobras raised QAV prices by about 55% for April."
Factual -
P7
"Market probability for a 50bp Selic cut in April was 27%."
Factual -
P8
"The conflict in the Middle East is in its 32nd day."
Factual In contradiction -
P9
"Trump will give an update on Iran at 10 PM Brasília time."
Factual -
P10
"Expectation of a peace agreement causes caused Brazilian interest rate futures to fall."
Causal -
P11
"Recent surge in oil prices causes was strengthening the view that the Central Bank would not have room to accelerate Selic cuts."
Causal -
P12
"Expectation of a war-ending agreement causes made the market increase bets on a 50bp cut."
Causal
Claim Relationships Graph
Detected Contradictions (12)
View Formal Logic Representation
=== Propositions === P1 [factual]: The DI rate for Jan 2027 closed at 14.035%. P2 [factual]: The DI rate for Jan 2029 closed at 13.675%. P3 [factual]: The DI rate for Jan 2036 closed at 13.870%. P4 [factual]: The 2-year Treasury yield closed at 3.805%. P5 [factual]: The 10-year Treasury yield closed at 4.321%. P6 [factual]: Petrobras raised QAV prices by about 55% for April. P7 [factual]: Market probability for a 50bp Selic cut in April was 27%. P8 [factual]: The conflict in the Middle East is in its 32nd day. P9 [factual]: Trump will give an update on Iran at 10 PM Brasília time. P10 [causal]: Expectation of a peace agreement causes caused Brazilian interest rate futures to fall. P11 [causal]: Recent surge in oil prices causes was strengthening the view that the Central Bank would not have room to accelerate Selic cuts. P12 [causal]: Expectation of a war-ending agreement causes made the market increase bets on a 50bp cut. === Constraints === P1 contradicts P4 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2027 vs 2 P1 contradicts P5 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2027 vs 10 P1 contradicts P8 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2027 vs 32 P2 contradicts P4 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2029 vs 2 P2 contradicts P5 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2029 vs 10 P2 contradicts P8 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2029 vs 32 P3 contradicts P4 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2036 vs 2 P3 contradicts P5 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2036 vs 10 P3 contradicts P8 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2036 vs 32 P4 contradicts P5 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2 vs 10 P4 contradicts P8 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 2 vs 32 P5 contradicts P8 Note: Conflicting values for 'the': 10 vs 32 === Causal Graph === expectation of a peace agreement -> caused brazilian interest rate futures to fall recent surge in oil prices -> was strengthening the view that the central bank would not have room to accelerate selic cuts expectation of a warending agreement -> made the market increase bets on a 50bp cut === Detected Contradictions === UNSAT: P1 AND P4 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P4 UNSAT: P1 AND P5 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P5 UNSAT: P1 AND P8 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P1 and P8 UNSAT: P2 AND P4 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P2 and P4 UNSAT: P2 AND P5 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P2 and P5 UNSAT: P2 AND P8 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P2 and P8 UNSAT: P3 AND P4 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P3 and P4 UNSAT: P3 AND P5 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P3 and P5 UNSAT: P3 AND P8 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P3 and P8 UNSAT: P4 AND P5 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P5 UNSAT: P4 AND P8 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P4 and P8 UNSAT: P5 AND P8 Proof: Heuristic: Values conflict between P5 and P8
Want to score another article? Paste a new URL →