▸ Article
Votantes do sexo feminino já são 52,8% do total, numa alta de 2 pontos percentuais desde 2002; número ainda deve subir na regularização de títulos até maio
As eleições de 2026 caminham para ter um novo recorde de eleitoras mulheres. Dados do TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) de março mostram que as votantes habilitadas do sexo feminino são 52,8% do total. Em 2002, eram 50,8%. Houve uma alta de 2 pontos percentuais no período. Na comparação com 2022, o crescimento foi de 0,2 ponto percentual.
Em números absolutos, há hoje 82,8 milhões de mulheres e 73,9 milhões de homens eleitores registrados. Esse total ainda deve crescer porque a população tem até 6 de maio para regularizar o título de eleitor.
No infográfico abaixo, é possível visualizar a curva de eleitoras mulheres se descolando cada vez mais da dos homens:
O eleitorado feminino é um dos mais disputados pelos pré-candidatos à Presidência da República. O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) e o senador Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) fazem acenos constantes a esse grupo.
BRASÍLIA: MAIOR PERCENTUAL
O Distrito Federal tem 54,2% das eleitoras mulheres. É o maior percentual do Brasil. O Pará tem o menor: 50,8%.
As regiões Sul, Sudeste e uma parte do Nordeste concentram as maiores proporções de votantes do sexo feminino.
Hover overTap highlighted text for details
▸ Source Quality 4/5
Source classification (primary/secondary/tertiary), named vs anonymous, expert credentials, variety
Summary
The article relies on a primary, official data source (TSE) and provides specific statistics, but lacks direct quotes or named expert analysis.
Findings 3
"Dados do TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) de março"
Cites official, primary data from the electoral authority.
Primary source"52,8% do total"
Provides a specific, attributed statistic.
Statistic"82,8 milhões de mulheres e 73,9 milhões de homens"
Provides detailed, absolute numbers to support the claim.
Statistic▸ Perspective Balance 2/5
Acknowledgment of multiple viewpoints, counterarguments, and balanced presentation
Summary
The article presents a factual trend but frames political competition for the female vote by naming only two specific politicians from opposing parties, without presenting broader perspectives or counterarguments about the trend's significance.
Findings 1
"O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) e o senador Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) fazem acenos constantes a esse grupo."
Identifies political actors courting the demographic but does not explore other viewpoints or critiques of this focus.
One sided▸ Contextual Depth 3/5
Background information, statistics, comprehensiveness of coverage
Summary
Provides basic historical comparison (2002, 2022) and geographical breakdown, but lacks deeper analysis of causes, implications, or expert commentary.
Findings 2
"Em 2002, eram 50,8%. Houve uma alta de 2 pontos percentuais no período. Na comparação com 2022, o crescimento foi de 0,2 ponto percentual."
Provides historical context by comparing data from 2002 and 2022.
Background"RCENTUAL O Distrito Federal tem 54,2% das eleitoras mulheres. É o m"
Adds geographical context by highlighting regional variations.
Context indicator▸ Language Neutrality 5/5
Absence of loaded, sensationalist, or politically biased language
Summary
Language is consistently factual, descriptive, and free of sensationalist or politically loaded terms.
Findings 2
"Eleições de 2026 terão novo recorde de eleitoras mulheres"
Headline is a neutral, factual statement.
Neutral language"fazem acenos constantes a esse grupo"
Uses a neutral phrase ('make constant overtures') to describe political appeals.
Neutral language▸ Transparency 4/5
Author attribution, dates, methodology disclosure, quote attribution
Summary
Article has clear author and date attribution, and sources its data clearly. Lacks a stated methodology for data analysis and does not attribute the claim about politicians to a specific source.
Findings 1
"Dados do TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) de março"
Clearly attributes the core data to its source.
Quote attribution▸ Logical Coherence 5/5
Internal consistency of claims, absence of contradictions and unsupported causation
Summary
The article presents a clear, logical progression from data presentation to a minor implication, with no detected contradictions or unsupported leaps.
Findings 1
"Esse total ainda deve crescer porque a população tem até 6 de maio para regularizar o título de eleitor."
Logically connects a future deadline to a potential increase in the presented numbers.
NeutralCore Claims
"The 2026 elections will set a new record for female voters."
Attributed to March 2026 data from the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), showing women are 52.8% of voters, a 2 percentage point increase since 2002. Primary
"The female electorate is highly contested by pre-candidates for the Presidency."
Presented as a general observation, citing the actions of President Lula and Senator Flávio Bolsonaro as examples, but not attributed to a specific source. Unattributed
Logic Model Inspector
ConsistentExtracted Propositions (5)
-
P1
"Women are 52.8% of total voters as of March 2026."
Factual -
P2
"There are 82.8 million registered female voters and 73.9 million male voters."
Factual -
P3
"The Federal District has the highest percentage of female voters at 54.2%."
Factual -
P4
"Pará has the lowest percentage at 50.8%."
Factual -
P5
"The total number of voters will still grow because the causes population has until May 6 to regularize their voter ID."
Causal
Claim Relationships Graph
View Formal Logic Representation
=== Propositions === P1 [factual]: Women are 52.8% of total voters as of March 2026. P2 [factual]: There are 82.8 million registered female voters and 73.9 million male voters. P3 [factual]: The Federal District has the highest percentage of female voters at 54.2%. P4 [factual]: Pará has the lowest percentage at 50.8%. P5 [causal]: The total number of voters will still grow because the causes population has until May 6 to regularize their voter ID. === Causal Graph === the total number of voters will still grow because the -> population has until may 6 to regularize their voter id
All claims are logically consistent. No contradictions, temporal issues, or circular reasoning detected.
Want to score another article? Paste a new URL →