Jornalista.ai — Brazil's Journalism Quality Index

Source Quality 3

Perspective Balance 3

Contextual Depth 3

Language Neutrality 5

Transparency 4

Logical Coherence 5

▸ Article

O Estado de São Paulo registrou três novos casos de febre amarela, segundo comunicado desta quinta-feira (23) da Secretaria da Saúde local. Dois pacientes que moravam no Vale do Paraíba morreram.

As vítimas são dois homens, um de 56 anos e outro de 53. Eles eram residentes da cidade de Lagoinha.

O terceiro caso foi registrado na região de Sorocaba, na cidade de Araçariguama, mas o homem de 43 anos conseguiu se curar.

Na semana passada houve o registro de outros três casos da doença, sendo que um homem de 38 anos, da cidade de Cunha, morreu. Em Cruzeiro, dois pacientes se curaram. Estas duas cidades também estão na região do Vale do Paraíba.

Em todos os casos registrados neste ano, os pacientes não tinham histórico de vacinação. A Secretaria da Saúde de São Paulo reforça que a vacina — que é gratuita — é a medida mais importante e eficaz para prevenir a febre amarela.

A vacina contra a febre amarela está disponível nas Unidades Básicas de Saúde (UBSs) e em postos de saúde do SUS.

Crianças devem receber uma dose aos 9 meses e, depois, um reforço aos 4 anos de idade. Quem recebeu uma dose antes dos 5 anos deve tomar reforço.

Pessoas de 5 a 59 anos que não foram vacinadas também têm de receber a dose. Leia também: Carnaval de BH é reconhecido como patrimônio cultural de Minas É fisioterapeuta inscrito no Conselho? Eleição para novo colegiado ocorre hoje. Veja como votar

Hover overTap highlighted text for details

Source Quality

Perspective

Context

Neutrality

Transparency

Logic

▸ Source Quality 3/5

3/5 Score

Source classification (primary/secondary/tertiary), named vs anonymous, expert credentials, variety

Summary

Article attributes information to the São Paulo State Health Department (Secretaria da Saúde). No other named sources are cited.

Findings 1

"segundo comunicado desta quinta-feira (23) da Secretaria da Saúde local"

Primary source is the Health Department's official statement, but no individual named officials or experts.

Secondary source

▸ Perspective Balance 3/5

3/5 Score

Acknowledgment of multiple viewpoints, counterarguments, and balanced presentation

Summary

The article is purely factual reporting with no alternative perspectives or counterarguments presented.

Findings 1

"A Secretaria da Saúde de São Paulo reforça que a vacina — que é gratuita — é a medida"

Only the official health authority's view is presented, no other perspectives (e.g., vaccine hesitancy) are addressed.

One sided

▸ Contextual Depth 3/5

3/5 Score

Background information, statistics, comprehensiveness of coverage

Summary

Provides some background on previous cases and vaccination recommendations, but lacks broader epidemiological context or historical data.

Findings 1

"Na semana passada houve o registro de outros três casos da doença"

Provides temporal context for previous cases.

Context indicator

▸ Language Neutrality 5/5

5/5 Score

Absence of loaded, sensationalist, or politically biased language

Summary

Language is entirely factual and neutral, no emotional or loaded terms detected.

Findings 1

"O Estado de São Paulo registrou três novos casos de febre amarela"

Factual and objective reporting.

Neutral language

▸ Transparency 4/5

4/5 Score

Author attribution, dates, methodology disclosure, quote attribution

Summary

Author (Agência Brasil) and date (2026-04-23) are present. Quote attribution is clear from Health Department. No methodology disclosed.

▸ Logical Coherence 5/5

5/5 Score

Internal consistency of claims, absence of contradictions and unsupported causation

Summary

No logical inconsistencies detected; the report is internally consistent.

Core Claims

"Three new yellow fever cases in São Paulo, two deaths."

São Paulo State Health Department official statement Named secondary

"Victims were unvaccinated."

Cited from Health Department statement Named secondary

Logic Model Inspector

Consistent

Extracted Propositions (9)

P1

"Three new cases of yellow fever in São Paulo state."

Factual
P2

"Two men, ages 56 and 53, from Lagoinha died."

Factual
P3

"A 43-year-old man from Araçariguama recovered."

Factual
P4

"Previous week had three cases, one death in Cunha, two recovered in Cruzeiro."

Factual
P5

"All patients this year had no vaccination history."

Factual
P6

"Vaccine is free and available at UBS and SUS health posts."

Factual
P7

"Children should get a dose at 9 months and a booster at 4 years."

Factual
P8

"People 5-59 years old who are unvaccinated should receive a dose."

Factual
P9

"No vaccination history causes yellow fever infection (implied by context)"

Causal

Claim Relationships Graph

Contradiction

Causal

Temporal

View Formal Logic Representation

=== Propositions ===
P1 [factual]: Three new cases of yellow fever in São Paulo state.
P2 [factual]: Two men, ages 56 and 53, from Lagoinha died.
P3 [factual]: A 43-year-old man from Araçariguama recovered.
P4 [factual]: Previous week had three cases, one death in Cunha, two recovered in Cruzeiro.
P5 [factual]: All patients this year had no vaccination history.
P6 [factual]: Vaccine is free and available at UBS and SUS health posts.
P7 [factual]: Children should get a dose at 9 months and a booster at 4 years.
P8 [factual]: People 5-59 years old who are unvaccinated should receive a dose.
P9 [causal]: No vaccination history causes yellow fever infection (implied by context)

=== Causal Graph ===
no vaccination history -> yellow fever infection implied by context

All claims are logically consistent. No contradictions, temporal issues, or circular reasoning detected.

Want to score another article? Paste a new URL →