The House Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ) postponed on Tuesday (19) the analysis of Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) 32/2015 — a proposal that reduces the criminal age of majority from 18 to 16 years for specific crimes. The extraordinary meeting was ended after the start of the Order of the Day in the plenary, which automatically interrupts committee activities. ✓
Press quotes (1)
"A Comissão de Constituição e Justiça e de Cidadania (CCJC) da Câmara dos Deputados adiou, nesta terça-feira (19), a análise da Proposta de Emenda à Constituição (PEC) 32/2015, que prevê a redução da maioridade penal. A reunião extraordinária foi encerrada após o início da Ordem do Dia no plenário da Câmara, o que interrompe as atividades das comissões."
The main proposal was presented by former congressman Gonzaga Patriota (PE) and originally provided for not only the reduction of criminal majority age but also the anticipation of civil majority to 16 years. The report by rapporteur Colonel Assis (PL-MT), which began to be read during the session, recommends approval of only the criminal part, removing civil rights to avoid what he called "legal confusion." ✓
Press quotes (1)
"A principal proposta em análise é a PEC 32/2015, apresentada pelo ex-deputado Gonzaga Patriota (PE). O texto original previa não apenas a redução da maioridade penal, mas também a antecipação da maioridade civil para 16 anos."
Before the interruption, congresswomen Sâmia Bomfim (Psol-SP) and Talíria Petrone (Psol-RJ) presented requests for withdrawal and dismemberment of the PEC, both rejected. The first was rejected by 39 votes against and 10 in favor; the second by 38 votes to 5. According to the committee panel, 94 congressmen registered attendance during the session. ✓
Press quotes (1)
"No início da reunião, as deputadas Sâmia Bomfim (Psol-SP) e Talíria Petrone (Psol-RJ) solicitaram a retirada da PEC da pauta, mas o pedido foi rejeitado por 39 votos contrários e 10 favoráveis. Em seguida, Talíria apresentou um novo requerimento solicitando o desmembramento da PEC 32/2015. O pedido também foi rejeitado, desta vez por 38 votos a 5."
The text of PEC 32/2015 proposes to alter the Constitution to allow criminal responsibility for adolescents from 16 years old in specific cases, such as heinous crimes, intentional homicide and bodily harm followed by death. Currently, young people who commit serious infractions serve socio-educational internment measures for a maximum of three years, according to the Child and Adolescent Statute (ECA). ✓
Press quotes (1)
"O texto da PEC 32/2015 propõe alterar a Constituição para permitir a responsabilização penal de adolescentes a partir dos 16 anos em casos específicos, como crimes hediondos, homicídio doloso e lesão corporal seguida de morte."
With the reading of the incomplete report, the analysis of the proposal should be resumed in a next deliberative meeting of the CCJ, which could happen still this week or next. ✓
Press quotes (1)
"Com o encerramento da reunião, a leitura do parecer ficou incompleta. A análise da proposta deverá ser retomada em uma próxima reunião deliberativa da CCJC, que poderá acontecer ainda nesta semana ou na próxima."
The CCJ postponed analysis of PEC 32/2015 due to the start of the Order of the Day in the plenary
The main proposal is authored by former congressman Gonzaga Patriota (PE) and originally included civil majority
Covered by only some sources, or where the accounts diverge.
Covered by only some sources (2)
The debate involved criticisms about youth criminalization and proposal effectiveness
94 congressmen registered attendance at the session
-
What is the specific cause of the session interruption — lack of quorum, deliberate obstruction, or standard procedural rule?
Why it's still unknown: Sources only report that the session was ended due to the start of the Order of the Day, but do not clarify whether it was opposition strategy, technical accident, or normal procedure.
-
What are the Legislative Consultancy's technical reports on constitutional and fiscal impact of the proposals?
Why it's still unknown: No source mentions formal technical analyses on constitutional compatibility or cost estimates for the penal system for minors.
-
What is the federal government's official position on the proposals?
Why it's still unknown: Sources do not report Executive branch manifestation, which would be relevant to predict vetoes in case of approval.